Last updated: December 1, 2015

Improve Your Rankings | Apply For Rankings | Evaluation Criteria

 

Best Merchant Processing Companies - December {year]

UPWARD
TREND
DOWNWARD
TREND
NO
CHANGE
 
 

Rank

Company Name

Year
Founded

Revenue

Fulltime
Employees

Active
Clients

Client
Retention
Rate

Pricing

Major Clients

Other Core
Services

Competitive Rates

Reliability

Efficiency

Variance

Customer Support

Overall Score

0
100
 
G
VG
E
 

Change in Rank

Leaders

1

eCOMM Merchant Solutions Co. Meath, Ireland

Noel Moran
+353 46 90 79101
More info

Visit Website

2014

$3 million - $5 million

40

60

88%

L

Confidential

 

100

 

100

 

100

 

100

 

100

100%

NC

 

2

Wirecard AG GERMANY, United Kingdom

Niclaus Mewes
+44-04989442404
More info

Visit Website

2010

$3 million - $5 million

41

70+

88%

L

orderbird, Sportler AG, FC-Moto

 

99

 

100

 

98

 

99

 

100

99.2%
Increased +6

+6

 

3

SecureTrading Ltd. Bangor, United Kingdom

Ian, Hughes
+44-3332406000
More info

Visit Website

1997

$3 million - $5 million

40

110+

93%

L

barclaycard, Elavon, First data

 

97

 

99

 

98

 

100

 

98

98.4%
Increased +4

+4

 
Strong Performers

4

Nochex Ltd Leeds, United Kingdom

Nochex Ltd
+44-01133443996
More info

Visit Website

2000

$3 million - $5 million

51 - 100

100+

91%

H

CQout, eBid.net, ekmPowershop, Romancart, X-Cart

 

96

 

99

 

97

 

100

 

97

97.8%
Decreased -1

-1

 

5

Adelante Software Limited Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Darrell Bluck
+44-01628820600
More info

Visit Website

1997

$3 million - $5 million

Above 100

100+

94%

H

ORIFLAME sweden, DYNO-ROD, neilson, TRITON, Ann Summers

 

96

 

98

 

97

 

100

 

96

97.4%
Increased +5

+5

 

6

Elavon UK Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

Stuart Harvey
678-731-5020,
More info

Visit Website

2005

$3 million - $5 million

51 - 100

31+

94%

H

Confidential

 

97

 

96

 

97

 

96

 

97

96.6%
Decreased -5

-5

 
Contenders

7

Streamline Harrogate, United Kingdom

Philip Jansen
+44-08457616263
More info

Visit Website

1997

$5 million - $10 million

Above 100

100+

98%

H

Alexeeva & Jones, Chiropractic Associates, Yorkshire Sculpture Park (YSP)

 

96

 

97

 

96

 

98

 

14

80.2%
Increased +2

+2

 

8

eMerchantPay Boca Raton, Florida

Chris Rive
888-833-2842
More info

Visit Website

2002

$3 million - $5 million

51 - 100

110+

93%

L

Echeck, Iris Analytics, Panoptic security, csc27.com, G2 web services

 

96

 

96

 

97

 

96

 

94

95.8%
Decreased -6

-6

 

9

PaymentSense Ltd. London, United Kingdom

Paymentsense Ltd
+44-08082565069
More info

Visit Website

2006

$3 million - $5 million

51 - 100

110+

88%

H

Nationwide Caterers Association Ltd, Entertainment Retailers Association : ERA, Vehicle Builders and Repairers Association, NTDA, UK Trades Confederation

 

95

 

94

 

95

 

95

 

97

95.2%
Decreased -3

-3

 

10

Cash2Bank London, United Kingdom

Jermaine Lamothe
+44-2035042443
More info

Visit Website

2014

$1 million - $3 million

51 - 100

30+

90%

H

Confidential

 

94

 

96

 

94

 

95

 

95

94.8%
Decreased -6

-6

 
Evaluation Criteria: Best Merchant processing Companies
Competitive Rates

We evaluate and rank the best companies that offer merchants the ability to process payments quickly and efficiently. During our analysis, we determine whether the vendors we are recommending offer their merchants competitive rates and fees associated with their processing solutions. Competitive rates are required for merchants to be able to accept payments from their clients while still obtaining a profit from their services.

Reliability

In addition to featuring competitive rates, merchant processing companies should provide a reliable service which affords merchants the opportunity to accept payments at all times. Having a service that is unreliable can cause a merchant to have to troubleshoot accepting a payment from a client which may in the end prove to prevent them from being able to accept the payment and potentially lose the sale they achieved.

Efficiency

It is important for the payment process to be both quick and efficient to ensure the funds are going to be available at the moment of the client producing the payment. We investigate whether the vendor is offering their service with an efficient process for determining whether a payment is properly authorized or not and relaying that information to the merchant to give them the opportunity to rectify the payment issue.

Variance

It is important for merchant service providers featured in our rankings to offer a variety of payment processing solutions for the merchants they assist. During our analysis of merchant processing companies we measure the variety of processing solutions they offer to their merchants, how they differ in features and use, and the end value which merchants achieve when using the different payment solutions.

Customer Support

For merchant processing companies we spend time analyzing the amount of effort placed into providing quality customer support to merchants. We recommend vendors which place priority into ensuring merchants have their questions and concerns addressed in a timely manner. For technical support, we also measure the knowledge and expertise of those involved with solving the issues merchants have with the services.

 
topcreditcardprocessors.com Everywhere!

Reach us from wherever you are. Get the latest updates fast.

 

Copyright 2015 © topcreditcardprocessors. Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Legal Disclosure

Request a Quote


,

Talk to a Representative:

 
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Request a Call


,

Talk to a Representative:

 
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Schedule an Agent to Visit


,

Talk to a Representative:

 
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact Us

9045 Strada Stell Court
Suite 103
Naples, FL 34109

Talk to a Representative:

239-314-0274
 
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.